JavaScript is disabled. Please enable to continue!

Mobile search icon
Food Testing >> Resources >> What is the Difference Between Reporting Microbiology Testing per CFU or MPN?

What is the Difference Between Reporting Microbiology Testing per CFU or MPN?

Sidebar Image

CFU vs. MPN

The difference between reporting as CFU or MPN per unit of measure is due to their respective methods. CFUs or "colony forming units" are determined by directly counting visible colonies of bacterial growth on the plate or film. MPN, or Most Probable Number, on the other hand measures growth statistically. In this method, sample is added to a series of test tubes with special media at different concentrations. The MPN value is then measured based on the reaction levels in the tubes and the value is then calculated with a 95% confidence interval. 

MPN Performance and Sensitivity

MPN methods generally have a slightly lower limit of quantification than do CFU methods. If increased sensitivity is desired, then an MPN method can be considered.

Special Considerations in Method Selection 

Occasionally there is a regulatory requirement for an MPN method, such as drinking water portability standards for coliform count. Alternatively, if a sample has known antimicrobial activity then CFU methods may be a better choice due to greater dilution during sample preparation. There also may be cost differences between the two methods.

Peteris Spels, Business Unit Manager for Eurofins Microbiology Laboratories, Inc. of Providence area, Rhode Island, explains the key details of these methods in the following video:

For further questions on this topic:

Connect with an expert.

 

Additional Resources

Making Sense of Presumptive Positives On-Demand Webinar

What is the Difference Between Absence, Negative, and Not Detected

Microbiological Specifications in Food Operations

https://www.eurofinsus.com/food-testing