FDA's Proposed Rule for Front-of-Package (FOP) Nutrition Labeling

Check out our infographic about the FDA's proposed rule for front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling. Download the infographic here.
Key Points
- Goal is to require easily noticeable & obvious nutrition information separate from the Nutrition Facts Panel with the intent to draw immediate attention to the consumer’s dietary choices
- The labeling requirements are already
- Meant to complement FDA’s 2016 Nutrition Facts Panel regulation updates, as well as updated definition for “Healthy” and sodium reduction efforts
- Has been discussed for approximately two decades and FDA conducted research for best approach, including focus groups and experimental studies
- Not to be confused with Facts Up Front Label, which is industry-derived and does not highlight whether a product is low or high in a particular nutrient:
- FDA has never defined “high” definition for nutrients of concern. This is a first.
Proposed Format
- Aesthetically a more robust streamlined version of the standard Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP)
- Uses the verbiage Low, Med, & High to “flag” nutrient content with respect to % Daily Value
- ≤ 5% = Low
- 6-19% = Med
- ≥ 20% = High
- Caloric content is not included but FDA says manufacturers can elect to share that information
- Placed near the top third of the Principal Display Panel (PDP)
- FDA advises simple font (for example, Helvetica)
- FDA advises minimum of 8 point type size, with other recommendations for box size with respect to total package area
- Also includes proposed update to nutrient content claim regulations for “low”, specifically sodium
- Sodium (from 140mg to 115mg)
- Saturated Fat (no change)
- Added Sugars (no requirements)
Industry Comments
- Comment period for public comments is 120 days from initial proposed rule
- Less flashy than graphics used by other countries
- Manufacturers must surrender valuable marketing space on the PDP & spend money on re-design of packaging
- FDA’s nutrient content regulations primarily give manufacturers guidelines for positive claims where this is requiring them to claim nutrient content in a “negative” light
- Many argue that proposed rule does not focus on the most imperative criteria in aiding consumers to make positive diet choices (i.e. calories, beneficial nutrients, & limiting nutrients)
Ready to get started? Contact us to learn more about nutrition analysis by Eurofins.